Technologies
Counseling & Strategic Advice
IP Transactions
Litigation
PTAB Proceedings
Start-Up
Technology Transfer
Trademark & Designs
U.S. Patent Procurement (Application Drafting & Prosecution)Fast Facts
Law Firm
Headquartered within steps of the USPTO with an affiliate office in Tokyo, Oblon is one of the largest law firms in the United States focused exclusively on intellectual property law.
History
1968
Norman Oblon with Stanley Fisher and Marvin Spivak launched what was to become Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, one of the nation's leading full-service intellectual property law firms.
Global Reach
Outside the US, we service companies based in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and farther corners of the world. Our culturally aware attorneys speak many languages, including Japanese, French, German, Mandarin, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi, Chinese.
ACCOLADES
Oblon's professionals provide industry-leading IP legal services to many of the world's most admired innovators and brands.
Career
From the minute you walk through our doors, you'll become a valuable part of a team that fosters a culture of innovation, client service and collegiality.
GET In Touch
Patent Forms
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules implementing the inventor's oath or declaration provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) on August 14, 2012.
Our Blogs
LATEST NEWS
PUBLICATIONS
Les Nouvelles - Licensing Executives Society International (LESI)
Events
November 11, 2024
October 9-10, 2024 in Tokyo and Osaka
Blogs
Article
PTO Issues Guidelines: Admitted Prior Art Cannot Be the Basis of an IPR Challenge
Under 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), IPRs are only instituted "on the basis of" patents and printed publications. But, occasionally petitioners have relied on statements in a patent's specification as "applicant admitted prior art" and included that prior art in their grounds in a petition—either alone or in combination with other references.
RCE/National Stage Kerfuffle: PTO Creates a Nightmare Scenario
Much has been written lately about the USPTO's recent enforcement of its controversial interpretation of filing Requests for Continued Examination (RCE) in National Stage applications (i.e., applications under 35 U.S.C. §371) where the oath/declaration was not filed prior to filing the RCE. This post will not address the legal merits of the USPTO's position.
The Federal Circuit Provides a Refresher on Joint Inventorship
The decision in Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. v. Ono Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Tasuku Honjo, E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (Fed. Cir., July 14, 2020) was an appeal of a determination of joint inventorship from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
Deep Learning
Sameer Gokhale is quoted in the NVTC magazine The Voice of Technology in an article entitled: "Deep Learning." This article is featured in the July 2020 issue.
The Voice of Technology - NVTC
